Title | Updated analysis of CALGB (Alliance) 100104 assessing lenalidomide versus placebo maintenance after single autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Authors | Holstein, SA, Jung, S-H, Richardson, PG, Hofmeister, CC, Hurd, DD, Hassoun, H, Giralt, S, Stadtmauer, EA, Weisdorf, DJ, Vij, R, Moreb, JS, Callander, NS, van Besien, K, Gentile, TG, Isola, L, Maziarz, RT, Bashey, A, Landau, H, Martin, T, Qazilbash, MH, Rodriguez, C, McClune, B, Schlossman, RL, Smith, SE, Hars, V, Owzar, K, Jiang, C, Boyd, M, Schultz, C, Wilson, M, Hari, P, Pasquini, MC, Horowitz, MM, Shea, TC, Devine, SM, Linker, C, Anderson, KC, McCarthy, PL |
Journal | Lancet Haematol |
Volume | 4 |
Issue | 9 |
Pagination | e431-e442 |
Date Published | 2017 Sep |
ISSN | 2352-3026 |
Keywords | Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Humans, Lenalidomide, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Placebos, Survival Analysis, Thalidomide, Transplantation, Autologous, Young Adult |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: In the CALGB (Alliance) 100104 study, lenalidomide versus placebo after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) was investigated for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. That study showed improved time to progression and overall survival and an increase in second primary malignancies for lenalidomide at a median follow-up of 34 months. Here we report an updated intention-to-treat analysis of CALGB (Alliance) 100104 at a median follow-up of 91 months. METHODS: Patients were eligible for this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial if they had symptomatic disease requiring treatment; had received, at most, two induction regimens; and had achieved stable disease or better in the first 100 days after ASCT. We randomly assigned patients to either lenalidomide or placebo groups using permuted block randomisation, with a fixed block size of six. Randomisation was stratified by three factors: normal or elevated β2 microglobulin concentration at registration (≤2·5 mg/L vs >2·5 mg/L), previous use or non-use of thalidomide during induction therapy, and previous use or non-use of lenalidomide during induction therapy. The starting dose was two capsules (10 mg) per day, escalated to three capsules (15 mg) per day after 3 months. The primary endpoint was time to progression (time of progressive disease or death from any cause), with intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT00114101. New patients are no longer being recruited, but some patients remain on treatment and in follow-up. FINDINGS: Between April 14, 2005, and July 2, 2009, 460 patients were randomly assigned to receive either lenalidomide (n=231) or placebo (n=229). After three interim analyses, the study was unblinded at a median follow-up of 18 months, at which point 86 (67%) of 128 patients without progressive disease in the placebo group chose to cross over to the lenalidomide group. The median follow-up for the updated survival analysis, as of Oct 19, 2016, was 91 months (IQR 83·6-103·1). The median time to progression was 57·3 months (95% CI 44·2-73·3) for the lenalidomide group and 28·9 months (23·0-36·3) for the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·57, 95% CI 0·46-0·71; p INTERPRETATION: Despite an increase in haematological adverse events and second primary malignancies, lenalidomide maintenance therapy after ASCT significantly improved time to progression and could be considered a standard of care. FUNDING: The National Cancer Institute. |
DOI | 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30140-0 |
Alternate Journal | Lancet Haematol |
PubMed ID | 28826616 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC5718627 |
Grant List | U10 CA077658 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States UG1 HL069286 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States UG1 HL069249 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U01 HL069286 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180882 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 HL069294 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA032291 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States UG1 HL069301 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States UG1 CA233329 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U24 CA076518 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 HL069286 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA031946 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA021115 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA007968 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA033601 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 HL069301 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA021060 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180821 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States UG1 HL069315 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180858 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA059518 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA077440 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States UG1 HL109137 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180791 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA037447 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180850 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA047559 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA077651 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U01 HL069294 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180820 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180833 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180799 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180867 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180838 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA180866 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States U10 CA138561 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States |